Richiami di Controlli Automatici


 Peter Sherman
 4 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
2 Outline 1 Preliminaries Linear Systems Transfer function Block diagrams Frequency response Graphical representations of G(jω) 2 Feedback Control Systems The control problem Stability margins Nyquist Criterion Root locus G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
3 Dynamical Systems Preliminaries Linear Systems Statespace model A finite dimensional continuoustime dynamical system can be described by the following differential equations: ẋ(t) = f ( ) x(t), u(t), t, t 0, x(t0 ) = x 0 y(t) = η ( ) x(t), u(t), t, t 0 (1a) (1b) where: x(t) R n is the system state x(t 0 ) R n is the initial condition u(t) R m is the input vector y(t) R p is the output vector G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
4 Preliminaries Linear timeinvariant systems Linear Systems A linear timeinvariant (LTI) continuoustime system is described by ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t), x(0) = x 0 (2a) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) where A R n n, B R n m, C R p n and D R p m. A dynamical system with singleinput (m = 1) and singleoutput (p = 1) is called SISO, otherwise it is called MIMO. Matlab commands sys = ss(a,b,c,d) creates a statespace model object. y = lsim(sys,u,t) simulates the the time response of the LTI system sys. (2b) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
5 Preliminaries Linear Systems Equilibria of nonlinear dynamical systems Consider a nonlinear and timeinvariant system ẋ(t) = f ( x(t), u(t) ), x(0) = x 0 (3a) y(t) = η ( x(t), u(t) ) (3b) If the input is constant, i.e. u(t) = ū, then the equilibria x e1, x e2,..., x eq of such a system can be computed as solutions of the homogeneous equation f ( x e, ū) = 0, Given an equilibrium x ei the correspondent output is given by y ei = η ( x ei, ū ). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
6 Preliminaries Linear Systems Linearization around a given equilibrium If x 0 = x e + δx 0 and u(t) = ū + δu(t), with δx 0, δu(t) sufficiently small, then the behaviour of (3) around a given equilibrium ( ū, x e ) is well described by the linear system δẋ(t) = f x δy(t) = η x x = x e u = ū x = x e u = ū δx(t) + f u δx(t) + η u x = x e u = ū x = x e u = ū δu(t), δx(0) = δx 0 (4a) δu(t) (4b) The total output can be computed as y(t) = η ( x e, ū ) + δy(t). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
7 Example  Pendulum Preliminaries Linear Systems Mass m Length L Friction coefficient b G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
8 Example  Pendulum Preliminaries Linear Systems Nonlinear model Let then x(t) = ( θ(t) θ(t) ) u(t) = F(t) y(t) = θ(t) ẋ 1 (t) = x 2 (t) ẋ 2 (t) = g L sin x 1(t) y(t) = x 1 (t) b ml 2 x 2(t) + 1 ml cos x 1(t)u(t) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
9 Example  Pendulum Preliminaries Linear Systems Equilibria If ū = mg, solving f ( x e, ū ) = 0 we get x ek = ( π 4 + kπ 0 ) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
10 Example  Pendulum Preliminaries Linear Systems Around the equilibria x e = ( π 4 0) T the behaviour of the pendulum is well described by the linear system δẋ 1 (t) = δx 2 (t) 2g δẋ 2 (t) = L δx 1(t) b ml 2 δx 2(t) + 1 δu(t) 2mL δy(t) = δx 1 (t) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
11 Preliminaries Asymptotic stability of LTI systems Linear Systems Asymptotic stability This property roughly asserts that every solution of ẋ(t) = Ax(t) tends to zero as t. Note that for LTI systems the stability property is related to the system and not to a specific equilibrium. Theorem  System (2) is asymptotically stable iff A is Hurwitz, that is if every eigenvalue λ i of A has strictly negative real part R ( λ i ) < 0, λi. Theorem  System (2) is unstable if A has at least one eigenvalue λ with strictly positive real part, that is λ s.t. R ( λ ) > 0. Theorem  Suppose that A has all eigenvalues λ i such that R ( λ i ) 0, then system (2) is unstable if there is at least one eigenvalue λ such that R ( λ ) = 0 which corresponds to a Jordan block with size > 1. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
12 Preliminaries Linear Systems Equilibrium stability for nonlinear systems For nonlinear systems the stability property is related to the specific equilibrium. Theorem  The equilibrium state x e corresponding to the constant input ū a nonlinear system (3) is asymptotically stable if all the eigenvalues of the correspondent linearized system (4) have strictly negative real part. Theorem  The equilibrium state x e corresponding to the constant input ū a nonlinear system (3) is unstable if there exists at least one eigenvalue of the correspondent linearized system (4) which has strictly positive real part. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
13 Preliminaries Transfer function of LTI systems Transfer function Given a LTI system (2) the corresponding transfer matrix from u to y is defined as Y (s) = G(s)U(s), with s C. U(s) and Y (s) are the Laplace transforms of u(t) and y(t) with zero initial condition (x(0) = 0), and G(s) = C ( si A ) 1 B + D. (5) For SISO system (5) is called transfer function and it is equal to the Laplace transform of the impulsive response of system (2) with zero initial condition. Matlab commands sys = tf(num,den) creates a transfer function object. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
14 Transfer function Preliminaries Transfer function Given the transfer function G(s) and the Laplace transform of the input U(s) the time response of the system can be computed as the inverse transform of G(s)U(s), without solving differential equations. As an example, the step response of a system can be computed as: [ y(t) = L 1 G(s) 1 ]. s Matlab commands [y,t] = step(sys) computes the step response of the LTI system sys. [y,t] = impulse(sys) computes the impulse response of the LTI system sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
15 Preliminaries Poles and zeros of SISO systems Transfer function Given a SISO LTI system, its transfer function is a rational function of s G(s) = N(s) D(s) = ρ Π i(s z i ) Π j (s p j ), where N(s) and D(s) are polynomial in s, with deg ( N(s) ) deg ( D(s) ). We call p j poles of G(s) z i zeros of G(s) Matlab commands sys = zpk(z,p,k) creates a zerospolesgain object. p = eig(sys) or p = pole(sys) return the poles of the LTI system sys. z = zero(sys) returns the zeros of the LTI system sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
16 Preliminaries Poles and eigenvalues of a LTI system Transfer function Every pole of G(s) is an eigenvalue of the system matrix A. However, not every eigenvalue of A is a pole of G(s). If all the poles of G(s) have strictly negative real part i.e. they are located in the left half of the splane (LHP) the SISO system is said to be Bounded Input Bounded Output stable (BIBO). A system is BIBO stable if every bounded input to the system results in a bounded output over the time interval [0, ). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
17 Preliminaries Transfer function Time constants, natural frequencies and damping factors A transfer function can be also specified in terms of time constants (τ,t ) natural frequencies (ω n,α n ) damping factors (ξ,ζ) gain (µ) system type (i.e. number of poles/zeros in 0, g) G(s) = µ ( ) Π i (1 + T i s)π j ζ j α nj s + s2 α nj s g Π k (1 + τ k s)π l (1 + 2 ξ l ω nl s + s2 ω nl ). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
18 Block diagrams Preliminaries Block diagrams When dealing with transfer functions, it is usual to resort to Block diagrams which permit to graphically represent the interconnections between system in a convenient way. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
19 Series connection Preliminaries Block diagrams Matlab commands sys = series(sys1,sys2) makes the series interconnection between sys1 and sys2. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
20 Parallel connection Preliminaries Block diagrams Matlab commands sys = parallel(sys1,sys2) makes the parallel interconnection between sys1 and sys2. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
21 Feedback connection Preliminaries Block diagrams Matlab commands sys = feedback(sys1,sys2,[+1]) makes the feedback interconnection between sys1 and sys2. Negative feedback is the default. If the third parameter is equal to +1 positive feedback is applied. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
22 Preliminaries Stability of interconnected systems Block diagrams Given two asymptotically stable LTI systems G 1 (s) and G 2 (s) the series connection G 2 (s)g 1 (s) is asymptotically stable the parallel connection G 1 (s) + G 2 (s) is asymptotically stable the feedback connection G 1 (s) 1±G 1 (s)g 2 (s) is not necessarely stable G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
23 Frequency response Preliminaries Frequency response Given a LTI system the complex function G(jω) = C ( jωi A ) 1 B + D, with ω R is called frequency response of the system. G(jω) permits to evaluate the system steadystate response to a sinusoidal input. In particular if u(t) = A sin( ωt + ϕ), then the steadystate response of a LTI system is given by y(t) = G(j ω) ( ) A sin ωt + ϕ + G(j ω). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
24 Bode plot Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) Given a LTI system G(s) the Bode diagrams plot the magnitude of G(jω) (in db, G(jω) db = 20 log 10 G(jω) ) and the phase of G(jω) (in degree) as a function of ω (in rad/s) in a semilog scale (base 10). Bode plots are used for both analysis and synthesis of control systems. Matlab commands bode(sys) plots the the Bode diagrams of the LTI system sys. bodemag(sys) plots the Bode magnitude diagram of the LTI system sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
25 Bode plot  Example Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) Let consider 1 + s 1 + s G(s) = 10 ( ) = 10 s s s + 1 s(0.0025s s + 1) Matlab commands s = tf( s ); sys = 10*(1+s)/(s*(sˆ2/ *s/20+1)); bode(sys); grid G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
26 Bode plot  Example Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
27 Minimum phase systems Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) A stable system is said to be a minimum phase system if it has not time delays or righthalf plane (RHP) zeros. For minimum phase systems there is a unique relationship between the gain and phase of the frequency response G(jω). This may be quantified by the Bode s gainphase relationship G(j ω) = 1 π + d ln G(jω) d ln ω ln ω + ω ω ω dω ω. The name minimum phase refers to the fact that such a system has the minimum possible phase lag for the given magnitude response G(jω). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
28 Nyquist plot Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) The Nyquist is a polar plot of the frequency response G(jω) on the complex plane. This plot combines the two Bode plots  magnitude and phase  on a single graph, with frequency ω, which ranges in (, + ), as a parameter along the curve. Nyquist plots are useful to check stability of closedloop systems (see Nyquist stability criterion ). Matlab commands nyquist(sys) plots the Nyquist plot of the LTI system sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
29 Nyquist plot  Example Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
30 Nichols plot Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) It is similar to the Nyquist plot, since it plots both the magnitude and the phase of G(jω) on a single chart, with frequency ω as a parameter along the curve. As for the Bode plot the magnitude G(jω) is expressed in db and the phase G(jω) in degree. Nichols charts are useful for the design of control systems, in particular for the design of lead, lag, leadlag compensators. Matlab commands nichols(sys) plots the Nichols chart of the LTI system sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
31 Nichols plot  Example Preliminaries Graphical representations of G(jω) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
32 The control problem Feedback Control Systems The control problem The objective of a control system is to make the output of a plant y(t) behave in a desired way by manipulating the plant input u(t). A good controller should manipulate u(t) so as to counteract the effect of a disturbance d(t) (regulator problem) keep the output close to a given reference input r(t) (servo problem) In both cases we want the control error e(t) = y(t) r(t) to be small. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
33 Why feedback? Feedback Control Systems The control problem A major sources of difficulty are that 1 the plant model G(s) and the disturbance model G d (s) may be affected by uncertainty and/or may change with time 2 the disturbance is not always measurable 3 the plant can be unstable It turns out that e feedforward approach is not robust enough and/or is not always a viable solution. A feedback approach can guarantee the desired degree of robustness. However design a feedback control system is not straightforward: instability is around the corner! G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
34 Feedback Control Systems Performance and stability The control problem A good controller must guarantee: Nominal stability  The system is stable with no model uncertainty Nominal Performance  The system satisfies the performance specifications with no model uncertainty Robust stability The system is stable for all perturbed plants about the nominal model up to the worst case model uncertainty Robust performance The system satisfies the performance specifications for all perturbed plants about the nominal model up to the worst case model uncertainty G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
35 Feedback Control Systems One degreeoffreedom controller The control problem The input to the plant is given by U(s) = K (s) ( R(s) Y (s) N(s) ). The objective of control is to manipulate design a controller K (s) such that the control error e(t) = r(t) y(t) remains small in spite of disturbances d(t). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
36 Feedback Control Systems Terminology and Notation The control problem L(s) = G(s)K (s) is called loop transfer function S(s) = ( I + L(s) ) 1 is called sensitivity function T (s) = ( I + L(s) ) 1 L(s) is called complementary sensitivity function It is straightforward to note that T (s) + S(s) = I. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
37 One DOF controller Feedback Control Systems The control problem Exploiting the composition rules for block diagrams, it turns out that Y (s) = T R(s) + SG d D(s) T N(s) E(s) = S R(s) + SG d D(s) T N(s) U(s) = KS R(s) K (s)s(s)g d D(s) KS N(s) (6a) (6b) (6c) G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
38 One DOF controller Feedback Control Systems The control problem Remark  S(s) is called sensitivity because it gives the relative sensitivity of the closedloop transfer function T (s) to the relative plant model error. In particular, at a given frequency ω we have for a SISO plant that dt = S. T dg G Remark  Equations (6) are written in matrix form because they apply to MIMO systems. For SISO systems we may write S(s) = T (s) = L(s), L(s) 1 + L(s). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
39 The control dilemma Feedback Control Systems The control problem Let consider Y (s) = T R(s) + SG d D(s) T N(s). In order to reduce the effect of the disturbance d(t) on the output y(t), the sensitivity function S(s) should be made small (particularly in the low frequency range) In order to reduce the effect of the measurement noise n(t) on the output y(t), the complementary sensitivity function T (s) should be made small (particularly in the high frequency range) However, for all frequencies it is T + S = I. Thus a tradeoff solution must be achieved. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
40 Feedback Control Systems Feedback may cause instability The control problem One of the main issues in designing feedback controllers is stability. If the feedback gain is too large then the controller may overreact and the closedloop system becomes unstable. Download Simulink example G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
41 Feedback Control Systems The control problem Bandwidth and crossover frequency Usually the frequency response of loop transfer function L(jω) has a lowpass behaviour. The crossover frequency ω c is the frequency such that L(jω c) = 1. In most of the cases the crossover frequency is a good estimation of the closedloop bandwidth G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
42 Gain and phase margin Feedback Control Systems Stability margins The frequency response of the loop transfer function L(jω) can be used to estimate the stability margins. Gain margin (GM) 1/ L(jω 180, where ω 180 is the phase corssover frequency. Phase margin (PM) L(jω c) + 180, where ω c is the crossover frequency. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
43 Gain Margin Feedback Control Systems Stability margins The GM is the factor by which the loop gain L(jω) may be increased before the closedloop system becomes unstable. The GM is thus a direct safeguard against steadystate gain uncertainty. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
44 Phase Margin Feedback Control Systems Stability margins The phase margin tells how much phase lag can added to L(s) at frequency ω c before the phase at this frequency becomes 180 which corresponds to closedloop instability (see Nyquist stability criterion ). The PM is a direct safeguard against time delay uncertainty. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
45 Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion  Preliminaries Nyquist Criterion The Nyquist Criterion permits to check the stability of a closed loop system by using the Nyquist plot of the loop frequency response L(jω). The criterion is based on the fact the the closeloop poles are equal to the zeros of the transfer function D(s) = 1 + L(s). Hence, if D(s) has at least one zero z such that R( z) > 0 the closedloop system is unstable. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
46 Nyquist Criterion Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion Consider a loop frequency response L(jω) and let P be the number of poles of L(s) with strictly positive real part Z be the number of zeros of L(s) with strictly positive real part The Nyquist plot of L(jω) makes a number of encirclements N (clockwise) about the point ( 1, j0) equal to N = Z P. It turns out that the closedloop system is asymptotically if and only if the Nyquist plot of L(jω) encircle (counter clockwise) the point ( 1, j0) a number of times equal to P. The criterion is valid if the Nyquist plot of L(jω) do not intersect the point ( 1, j0). G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
47 Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion  Remarks Nyquist Criterion 1 If the loop transfer function L(s) has a zero pole of multiplicity l, then the Nyquist plot has a discontinuity at ω = 0. Further analysis indicates that the zero poles should be neglected, hence if there are no other unstable poles, then the loop transfer function L(s) should be considered stable, i.e. P = 0. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
48 Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion  Remarks Nyquist Criterion 1 If the loop transfer function L(s) has a zero pole of multiplicity l, then the Nyquist plot has a discontinuity at ω = 0. Further analysis indicates that the zero poles should be neglected, hence if there are no other unstable poles, then the loop transfer function L(s) should be considered stable, i.e. P = 0. 2 If the loop transfer function L(s) is stable, then the closedloop system is unstable for any encirclement (clockwise) of the point 1. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
49 Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion  Remarks Nyquist Criterion 1 If the loop transfer function L(s) has a zero pole of multiplicity l, then the Nyquist plot has a discontinuity at ω = 0. Further analysis indicates that the zero poles should be neglected, hence if there are no other unstable poles, then the loop transfer function L(s) should be considered stable, i.e. P = 0. 2 If the loop transfer function L(s) is stable, then the closedloop system is unstable for any encirclement (clockwise) of the point If the loop transfer function L(s) is unstable, then there must be one counter clockwise encirclement of 1 for each pole of L(s) in the righthalf of the complex plane. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
50 Feedback Control Systems Nyquist Criterion  Remarks Nyquist Criterion 1 If the loop transfer function L(s) has a zero pole of multiplicity l, then the Nyquist plot has a discontinuity at ω = 0. Further analysis indicates that the zero poles should be neglected, hence if there are no other unstable poles, then the loop transfer function L(s) should be considered stable, i.e. P = 0. 2 If the loop transfer function L(s) is stable, then the closedloop system is unstable for any encirclement (clockwise) of the point If the loop transfer function L(s) is unstable, then there must be one counter clockwise encirclement of 1 for each pole of L(s) in the righthalf of the complex plane. 4 If the Nyquist plot of L(jω) intersect the point ( 1, j0), then deciding upon even the marginal stability of the system becomes difficult and the only conclusion that can be drawn from the graph is that there exist zeros on the imaginary axis. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
51 Feedback Control Systems Root locus Location of the poles of a closedloop system The time behaviour of a closedloop system is strictly related to the position of its poles on the complex plane. For example, for a second order closedloop system it is possible to relate the features of the step response such as rise time overshoot settling time to the location of its poles. The Root Locus design method permits to evaluate how changes in the loop transfer function L(s) affect the position of the closedloop poles. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
52 The Root Locus Feedback Control Systems Root locus The closedloop poles are given by the roots of 1 + L(s). (7) Assuming that L(s) = ρl (s) the Root Locus plot the locus of all possible roots of (7) as ρ varies in the range [0, ). The Root Locus can be used to study the effect of additional poles and zeros in L (s), i.e. in the controller K (s). The Root Locus can be effectively used to design SISO controllers. Matlab commands rlocus(sys)  plots the root locus for the loop transfer function specified by sys. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
53 Root Locus  Example Feedback Control Systems Root locus L (s) = 1 + s s 1 s 3 + 3s 2 + 3s + 1 = 1 s(s + 1) 2. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
54 Root Locus  Example Feedback Control Systems Root locus Consider the unstable loop transfer function L (s) = 1 (s 2) 2 It is not possible to stabilize the system with a simple proportional controller. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
55 Root Locus  Example Feedback Control Systems Root locus Add a pole in 0 to have zero steadystate error L (s) = 1 s(s 2) 2 It is still not possible to stabilize the system with a simple proportional controller. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
56 Root Locus  Example Feedback Control Systems Root locus Add two zeros to draw the poles in the LHP The controller K (s) = ρ (s+10)2 s L (s) = (s + 10)2 s(s 2) 2 can stabilize the plant but is not causal. G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
57 Root Locus  Example Feedback Control Systems Root locus Add an high frequency pole to have a proper controller L (s) = The controller K (s) = ρ (s+10)2 can stabilize. s(s+100) (s + 10) 2 s(s + 100)(s 2) 2 G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
58 Suggested textbooks Appendix P. Bolzern, R. Scattolini and N. Schiavoni Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici McGrawHill, 2008 R. C. Dorf and R. H. Bishop Controlli Automatici Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010 G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell and A. EmamiNaeini Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008 S. Skogestad and I. Postlethwaite Multivariable Feedback Control  Analysis and Design John Wiley and Sons, 2006 G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
59 Appendix Feedback and Control for Everyone P. Albertos, I. Mareels Feedback and Control for Everyone Springer, 2010 G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici Napoli  Ottobre / 56
Robust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationIntroduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31
Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 20022003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationTable of Laplacetransform
Appendix Table of Laplacetransform pairs 1(t) f(s) oct), unit impulse at t = 0 a, a constant or step of magnitude a at t = 0 a s t, a ramp function e at, an exponential function s + a sin wt, a sine fun
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationBIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY
BIBO STABILITY AND ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY FRANCESCO NORI Abstract. In this report with discuss the concepts of boundedinput boundedoutput stability (BIBO) and of Lyapunov stability. Examples are given to
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationMAE 143B  Homework 9
MAE 143B  Homework 9 7.1 a) We have stable firstorder poles at p 1 = 1 and p 2 = 1. For small values of ω, we recover the DC gain K = lim ω G(jω) = 1 1 = 2dB. Having this finite limit, our straightline
More informationReturn Difference Function and ClosedLoop Roots SingleInput/SingleOutput Control Systems
Spectral Properties of Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Stability margins of singleinput/singleoutput (SISO) systems! Characterizations
More informationTransfer function and linearization
Transfer function and linearization Daniele Carnevale Dipartimento di Ing. Civile ed Ing. Informatica (DICII), University of Rome Tor Vergata Corso di Controlli Automatici, A.A. 2425 Testo del corso:
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 505900 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationFrequency Response Techniques
4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the splane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationLecture 14  Using the MATLAB Control System Toolbox and Simulink Friday, February 8, 2013
Today s Objectives ENGR 105: Feedback Control Design Winter 2013 Lecture 14  Using the MATLAB Control System Toolbox and Simulink Friday, February 8, 2013 1. introduce the MATLAB Control System Toolbox
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline InputOutput
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter 9.4 6 Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Emilio Frazzoli Institute
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai  625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam  Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Intro Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /5/27 Outline Closed Loop Transfer
More informationIntro to Frequency Domain Design
Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 9. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (559L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition
Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 58 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationMEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems
MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/8/25 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions
More informationLecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.
ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition
More informationClosedloop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Twodegreesoffreedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become
Closedloop system enerally MIMO case Twodegreesoffreedom (2 DOF) control structure (2 DOF structure) 2 The closed loop equations become solving for z gives where is the closed loop transfer function
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : RouthHurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency ResponseDesign Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8  Solutions. HW 8  Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8  Solutions HW 8  Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationAdditional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. ClosedLoop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability
More informationDESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD
206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationSingular Value Decomposition Analysis
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 23, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 23, Guzzella Ch. 23 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Stability RouthHurwitz stability criterion Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationIC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS
DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING YEAR/SEMESTER: II/IV IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION 1. What is the mathematical
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101  Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationIntroduction to Process Control
Introduction to Process Control For more visit : www.mpgirnari.in By: M. P. Girnari (SSEC, Bhavnagar) For more visit: www.mpgirnari.in 1 Contents: Introduction Process control Dynamics Stability The
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationSolutions to SkillAssessment Exercises
Solutions to SkillAssessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationEE 380. Linear Control Systems. Lecture 10
EE 380 Linear Control Systems Lecture 10 Professor Jeffrey Schiano Department of Electrical Engineering Lecture 10. 1 Lecture 10 Topics Stability Definitions Methods for Determining Stability Lecture 10.
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch Jacopo Tani
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 23 Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich September 28, 2018 J. Tani, E.
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractionalorder PID Controllers for Timedelayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractionalorder PID Controllers for Timedelayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationr +  FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of handwritten notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #20 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Closedloop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability Fall 2007 16.31 20 1 SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationSTABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable
ECE4510/5510: Feedback Control Systems. 5 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS 5.1: Boundedinput boundedoutput (BIBO) stability Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated
More informationFirstOrder LowPass Filter
Filters, Cost Functions, and Controller Structures Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 218! Dynamic systems as lowpass filters! Frequency response of dynamic systems!
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationAutonomous Mobile Robot Design
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationPlasma magnetic diagnostic and control at ITER & DEMO (& EAST)
Plasma magnetic diagnostic and control at ITER & DEMO (& EAST) Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 with contributions of the CREATE team (and many colleagues from CCFE, ENEA, IST, ASIPP,...) Dipartimento di Ingegneria
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8 am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 10.3 Final Exam Review
CDS 11/11: Lecture 1.3 Final Exam Review December 2, 216 Schedule: (1) Posted on the web Monday, Dec. 5 by noon. (2) Due Friday, Dec. 9, at 5: pm. (3) Determines 3% of your grade Instructions on Front
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationCourse Outline. Closed Loop Stability. Stability. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Nyquist Stability. Dr. Dunant Halim
Amme 3 : System Dynamics & Control Nyquist Stability Dr. Dunant Halim Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 5 Mar Introduction 2 12 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 19 Mar System Response
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationTime Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) splane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationECE 486 Control Systems
ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationMAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions
MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noisecancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the lowpass filter given, design a highpass filter,
More informationOn plasma vertical stabilization at EAST tokamak
On plasma vertical stabilization at EAST tokamak G. De Tommasi 1 Z. P. Luo 2 A. Mele 1 A. Pironti 1 B. J. Xiao 2 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II/CREATE, Napoli, Italy 2 Institute of Plasma
More informationPart IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5. An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems
Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5 An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems ē(s) ȳ(s) Σ K(s) G(s) z(s) H(s) z(s) = H(s)G(s)K(s) L(s) ē(s)=
More information