What about Personalized Learning in Reading?

  • reading instructions reading
  • 19 September, 2020
  • 8 Comments

Teacher question:

I would love to know what you think about the movement in personalized learning in K-8 schools. A few schools in my district have been moving to this approach for math instruction and I'd be interested in hearing your ideas of how this would look in reading and writing instruction. Thanks!

Shanahan responds:

Your question reminds me of the first time I tried to cook chicken.

I was in a hurry so I figured if I turned up the heat, I could cook it faster… and that works – but only on the outside of the chicken. The inside, I discovered, was almost as red as when I started. Raw chicken is neither tasty nor healthy and I ended up having to throw the whole unappetizing mess away.

Trying to eat chicken before it is ready is a bad idea.

I feel the same way about instructional approaches. “Personalized learning” for teaching reading is an idea whose time has not yet come. No matter how tantalizing the exterior, the insides are still too raw.

The basic idea of personalized learning is a good one and pioneers in this area have made some excellent advances in mathematics instruction (especially in the arithmetic part of that). When it comes to teaching, technology has a great future – something that I’ve been told repeatedly since I was first charged with designing lessons that could work on an IBM “mag card” set up in the early 1970s.

There are definitely some very specific skills that computers can do a great job with. For instance, according to the What Works Clearinghouse, there are several computer programs that can teach decoding effectively, and there are some experimental programs that can teach summary writing.

The notion of “personalizing” instruction is that the program will assess the students and then guide them through a curriculum aimed at teaching those skills that were assessed, monitoring student progress and adjusting the instruction as you go.

We don’t yet have a very complete idea of what it is that people need to learn to become readers or writers or speakers of other languages. Oh, we know the kinds of things that one has to learn Readers benefit from learning letter sounds, spelling patterns, and high frequency words, for instance. We can’t say with any certainty whether a given protocol will result in success. You teach a collection of phonemes to one child and he is a reader. You teach the same sounds to another, and though he masters the sounds, the result is different.

Accordingly, teaching literacy is more reciprocal than linear. A program might teach a youngster the letter “b” and its associated phoneme /b/ thoroughly and well and may not allow him/her to take on the challenge of “m” and /m/ until mastery is accomplished. That’s personalized but it is not necessarily going to result in success. And, if that is true with letter sounds, imagine the complications of teaching reading comprehension.

I have no doubt that personal learning approaches will get more and more sophisticated, flexible, and effective over time. Unfortunately, there are lots of cheerleaders out there who are touting this stuff already (sort of like me cooking the chicken in a hotter oven with the idea of getting it done faster). No matter how good the salesperson or how exciting it seems to be on the bleeding edge of technological progress, these aren’t the things that cook the chicken.

There is a reason why there are not yet any peer reviewed studies showing the positive impacts of personalized teaching in reading. Because no one has a program that is sufficiently effective to take most kids very far in reading. That could change, in fact, it is likely to, but until it does, I’d be careful about investing much in such an approach. (The studies that are there don't say much about how well the kids are learning--and they use words like potential and possibility a lot.)

One more story: Many years ago, parents of a learning-disabled middle school student were suing the school because their son was not doing well. They wanted to enroll him in a private high school for kids like him, and they wanted the school district to pay the cost of tuition (at that time it would have been more than $100,000). Both sides agreed to forego the courts and to have a mutually acceptable judgment from an expert in the field; me.

I studied the case carefully. The boy had been tested thoroughly when he entered the school, so they had a clear idea of what he needed. They purchased a commercial computer program aimed at teaching kids like him (it doesn’t matter what the program was, but it had a lot of research support showing its potential effectiveness and it was easily the best personalized learning tool available at the time). Now, however, after two years of working on that program, he was retested and found to be reading even lower than he started out.

How can such an effective program have such a terrible result?

I asked the boy. He said that when it started, he really like it. At ELA time, he would go to the library each day and log in and do the reading and the exercises and he thought it was fun and interesting. But over time, as he spent each day with the computer by himself, working on his reading he grew lonely and discouraged.

The “personal” in personal learning means individual or unique. In other words, each student will be taken through the lessons in their own way, a way tailored to their needs based on their past performance. In that sense, personal is an accurate description of the instruction.

Unfortunately, as many teachers are finding out during these days of confinement, this kind of personal does not mean warm, reassuring, or intimate. This young man was suffering from what Dan Willingham recently labeled “Zoom fatigue.” The student felt lonely and isolated from his peers (and from his teachers). He lapsed into a kind of learning lethargy and the school didn’t notice.

Reading and writing are language activities and a major purpose of learning language is to connect with other human beings. No matter how successfully technology is able to personalize or individualize teaching, at their heart reading and writing are social rather than individual pursuits and effective instruction must proceed on that basis.

My opinion of personalized learning in reading?

Turn the heat down to 350° and make sure it cooks all the way through before serving. It just isn’t ready yet.

Comments

See what others have to say about this topic.

Rachel Owen
Sep 19, 2020 05:30 PM

Great question, great answer. Thanks!

In a related note, teachers need to slow down and really take a look at any self-paced learning platform they intend to use. Don’t assume it will do what it promises. There is some real garbage out there.

As a support teacher, I had a classroom teacher ask me to help a few of our mutual students get up and running on a particular program that was supposed to adjust to their ability as they went along. I stopped after a few tries because, no exaggeration, every time I opened it I found serious issues of intellectual quality, like asking kids to sort animals into these three habitats: air, land, and sea. Another science question indicated a tadpole was to be categorized as living in the sea, but tadpoles are freshwater animals.

I gave up on using it and dedicated some time in the evening to collecting evidence of bad information in the program to share with colleagues to try to get them to dump the program. A few did.

Dr. Terry Leppien
Sep 19, 2020 06:34 PM

Awesome analogy!!
I work privately and individually with students in the area reading/spelling/language. We started Zooming in March and by May Zoom fatigue had set in for most of the students. I asked some students to come back into my, now virus protected, office and what a difference it made in their excitement about learning and their progress. By the end of June, the students who did not come back in to the office were very fatigued and unmotivated on Zoom. I will say, I have a student who has actually improved his attitude about reading since he started Zoom sessions. He continues on Zoom, with approximately monthly in office sessions to keep the personal connection.

Judy Ayers
Sep 19, 2020 09:26 PM

At K/1st grade levels, knowing letter sounds, blending them into words, spelling patterns and identifying sight words can’t be emphasized enough!

Nancy
Sep 20, 2020 12:51 AM

Does it have to be either/or? Yes, the programs available perhaps aren't as sophisticated as they will be one day, but even if some basic skills are mastered, couldn't a program be useful for times when teacher directed learning isn't occurring? I see times when students are working on independent activities that aren't of the highest quality. Wouldn't 20 minutes a day in a center rotation or to fill in when assignments are done be helpful? It seems to be that these types of programs could have some use.

Dawn Pearce
Sep 20, 2020 11:30 AM

I think the Montessori instruction I watched my own children go through balances personalized instruction with their hands on lessons along with the face-to-face contact in small groups to teach the next skill needed to progress them along their learning path. At the end of the year they took the SAT and always showed growth. As a teacher, I felt like their teacher truly knew their needs, especially since in Montessori school they stayed together for three years. A fabulous fit for my kids. Transitioned to public high school without a problem (everyone asks that).

Nancy M
Sep 20, 2020 11:39 PM

I have never thought that personalized learning was a computer program. Personalized learning involves shifting to student ownership and making students aware of the standards, expectaitons of profeciency, and moving along a continuum at their own pace. When you think of how differentiated our guided reading instruction is at the elementary level, we are already headed in the right direction. Students aready progress through leveled text at their own pace. The difference in personalized learning is that they are aware of what is needed in order to improve, they set goals, and learn to drive how they can prove their proficiency. The teacher's role is crucial here in conferring and facilitating learning. Computer programs are not personalized learning, but may be a small portion of instruction throughout a student's week. Here is a great resource on personalized learning. https://institute4pl.org/

Airam Cotto
Sep 21, 2020 06:47 PM

Great topic and thank you for sharing your thoughts! I agree with you 100%, reading and writing are of social nature. If eating a raw chicken is bad for your health, I can't even digest the idea of having a computer to teach a Kindergartener phonemic awareness to say the least. Personalized learning is not a "one size fits all" learning tool. Like every tool, it has its own usage or purpose. I do understand and favor the advantages and benefits that technology offers. However, it has to be a balance as to what students learn instructed by the compu (as my students used to call the computer) versus by the teacher.

Kate
Oct 20, 2020 09:13 PM

I see that this is from a few weeks back, but I think there is a misconception about the definition of personalized learning. It is not a computer adaptive program. I think Nancy M's description matches more of my own understanding. I think what I'm trying to wrap my brain around is balancing the social nature of reading and the high expectations of tackling complex texts AND the continuum of PA and Phonics skills. How do we allow learners to move fluidly through a curriculum while keeping them challenged and engaged? Thanks for your thoughts on adaptive programing though! I completely agree that reading is just not ready yet!

What Are your thoughts?

Leave me a comment and I would like to have a discussion with you!

Comment *
Name*
Email*
Website
Comments

What about Personalized Learning in Reading?

8 comments

One of the world’s premier literacy educators.

He studies reading and writing across all ages and abilities. Feel free to contact him.